Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Report
May 2017

From Paper to Practice: Sexuality Education Policies and Their Implementation in Peru

Author(s)

Angélica Motta, Elena Prada, Arón Núnez-Curto, Kelika Konda, Melissa Stillman and Carlos F. Cáceres

Please visit our Peru country profile for the latest data and additional resources.

    Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

    Donate

    Key Points

    Key Points
    • Unlike other countries in the region, Peru has no national binding regulatory framework to support a comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) program.
    • In 2008, the Ministry of Education enacted a set of guidelines to provide CSE in primary and secondary school; however, implementation has been weak due to a lack of political will, which is reflected in limited teacher training and the absence of monitoring and evaluation systems.
    • Support for CSE in schools is high. Ninety-seven percent of students, 100% of teachers and 98% of school principals consider CSE should be taught in school, and between 86-92% of students believe their parents agree with this.
    • The comprehensiveness of sexuality education at school is low: Only 9% of students receive instruction in all 18 topics that ensure comprehensive coverage.
    • Most teachers agree that students have a right to ample information about sexual relationships and reproductive health; they advise their students to protect themselves by using condoms when they have sex. However, one-third of teachers tell their students that having sex is dangerous and that they should avoid having sex before marriage.
    • The main challenges for CSE teachers are the lack of teaching resources or materials, lack of time in class and their own lack of training. Training for CSE teachers has been sporadic, and mainly provided through support from international cooperation. More technical and budgetary support is required from the Ministry of Education.
    • CSE should be strengthened in Peru by turning current regulations into law; establishing a mandatory national CSE program at primary and secondary education levels; and providing the corresponding technical and budgetary support.
    • A quality, continuous in-service training program is needed for CSE teachers.
    • CSE implementation must include a monitoring and evaluation system to allow progress to be measured and problems to be identified for quality improvement.

    English-language full report is available in PDF using download link above.

    Share

    View in:

    English , Español
    Download Report

    Topic

    Global

    • Teens: Comprehensive Sexuality Education

    Geography

    • Global
    • Latin America & the Caribbean: Peru

    Tags

    adolescents
    Partner
    Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    Guttmacher Institute

    Center facts. Shape policy.
    Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

    Donate Now
    Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
    • X
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Youtube
    • LinkedIn
    • Contact

    Footer

    • Privacy Policy
    • Accessibility Statement
    © 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.
    OSZAR »